Wireless RERC on the Record – Video Relay Services on Public and Enterprise Video Phones

Publication Type: 

September 2019 – The Wireless RERC submitted reply comments to the FCC’s Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Improving Video Relay Service and Direct Video Calling [CG Docket No. s 10-51 and 03-123]. The Wireless RERC supported consumer and provider stakeholders’ opposition to requiring a log-in for users of enterprise and public videophones. As asserted by the Consumer Groups, such a requirement runs counter to functional equivalency as defined by the Section 255 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.  To the Wireless RERC’s knowledge, no person without a disability in the workplace or public places such as a hospital or airport is required to log-in to use a business or public telephone.

Further, as stated by the Consumer Groups, “there are some VRS users whose cognitive abilities may not be sufficient to enter their VRS telephone number on demand, much less a PIN.[1]”  In support of this assertion, the Wireless RERC noted that approximately 2,835,949 non-institutionalized civilians are living with comorbid hearing and cognitive disabilities.[2] Cognitive domains impacted could include memory recall and memorizing ability. Also, the Wireless RERC agreed with and supported Convo’s assertion that “The best method to ensure that these public or enterprise devices are not misused remains what is already the current standard industry practice, VIs will disconnect a call when it is clear that the caller does not use or need ASL to telecommunicate.[3]” Not only does this practice relieve the consumer of burden, but it is also a less costly solution, in time and capital, compared to implementing a password or PIN safeguard. To read the full document, visit: https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1090478182582/Wireless%20RERC_Reply%20Comments_Improving%20VRS.pdf

 


[1] Consumer Groups. (2019). Comments submitted in response to Improving Video Relay Service and Direct Video Calling [10-51; 03-123]. Washington, D.C., August 5, 2019. Available at https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1080633036563/Consumer%20Groups%20VRS%20Structure%20FNPRM%20Comments.pdf

[2] Calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample. Based on a sample and subject to sampling variability. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

[3] Convo. (2019). Comments submitted in response to Improving Video Relay Service and Direct Video Calling [10-51; 03-123]. Washington, D.C., August 5, 2019. Available at https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10805121727164/Convo%20Comments%202019%20FNPRM.pdf

Date of Publication: 
Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Disclaimer

The contents of this website were developed under a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number 90RE5025-01-00). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.